Elizabeth Catlett, Invisble Man |
Don’t ask me how I became the head of the debate team. It’s laughable that my name and the word “coach”
would ever exist in the same sentence. Competitions make me anxious because I feel too deeply for the losers. But, I guess these are the breaks when you are a new employee. You have to take the assignments that
others have been wise enough to avoid.
Every Wednesday I meet with a group of around twenty 6th-8th
graders for an hour. During that time the
students conduct research on both sides of a topic determined by the debate
league that we belong to. They have to be knowledgeable
about both the proposition and opposition positions because they are not told
what side of the issue they will be asked to argue until the day of the debate. On Saturdays they compete against other
private and charter school students.
When I opened up my email earlier in the week, I read that
one of the three topics was “Ban the public displays of Confederate
symbols.” Today, as I copied the
statement onto the whiteboard in purple Expo marker, I shook my head at the
insensitivity of the topic. Dylan Roof
killed nine Americans in a church in June, and here we are in October asking
MIDDLE SCHOOL students research arguments justifying the display of Confederate symbols. People can be so clueless at times.
I didn’t really get angry until I sat down with the one
black girl on the team (also the only black person in the 8th grade). She was very clear about the fact that she
didn’t like the topic, and she asked me to send a letter to the organizers in protest. I don’t need to
imagine how uncomfortable she felt having to research a topic that made her
race especially salient. Luckily, her teammates were pretty disgusted with the topic as well- either that or they were scared of her :)
As we sat there in front of our laptops, I thought about all
of the crazy ways that this scenario could play out on the day of the
debate. Imagine one of the all black
charter school teams (who are sometimes mocked and always underestimated)
standing up defending the display of the Confederate flag, while the all white
the private school team makes the opposite argument. Who would I root for in that contest??
Or what if the debate organizers decided that the charter
school team should argue against the display of the Confederate symbols and
the black kids ended up losing the debate?
How self-esteem shattering would that be?
Yes, it is important for children to learn about all sides of an issue and understand the perspectives of the parties involved. However, asking a twelve year old black child to stand in front of a room of adults and her peers and justify the display of the Confederate flag four months after a racially motivated mass shooting is a slap in the face.
In America, we would never ask Jewish children to defend the
use of Nazi symbols in a debate. I would
hope that we would know better than to ask Native American students to argue in
favor of the Redskins team name and logo. Why then, would
we ask children who are the descendants of those who survived slavery to stand
up in front of an audience and defend the use of symbols glorifying it? What kind of hotmessmindfuckery is that? Think about the dissonance that that would
cause a black child.
And what of the white students? Some were able to approach the activity as a
purely intellectual exercise, but a few of the older students
were savvy enough to understand that they were copying language coded with
racism into their carefully organized GoogleDocs. I wondered what
assumptions would be made about them (fairly or unfairly) if they were a little
too convincing in their arguments in the opposition on the day of the debate. If they are chosen to defend the display of Confederate symbols, do they lose on purpose in order to avoid being perceived as a racist?
The most aggravating part of this is the fact that this
topic was chosen by people who probably did not consider any of these
issues. (Did they assume that all of the
debaters would be white kids with no emotional investment one way or the other?)
Because of
the ignorance of the organizers, I am put in the position of the black person who has to educate
grown people about race and risk being called "oversensitive". Or even worse, I am asked to turn moments of black discomfort into a "teachable moments" for white people. YUCK.
In Ralph Ellison’s novel,
Invisible Man, the vet tells the narrator to “play the game, but don’t
believe in it.” That is my usual strategy when I'm on Central Park West. Unfortunately, this is
one game that I can not play.
How tone deaf, how insensitive, how disgusting. Assuming that the intent behind the poor choice of specific topic was to debate free speech in regards to symbolic display, they could have easily have chosen something like the issue of the statue of the ten commandments in public civic property, or saying the pledge of allegiance in school. I'm not sure how I would pursue handling this, but I would hope the league would be amenable to altering the topic.
ReplyDelete